Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the 1960s, researchers have looked at the correlation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and bottom-line results. Within the European Union’s (EU’s) trade territory, CSR became a legal obligation. Canadian businesses interested in international expansion would benefit from learning more about the income opportunities presented by investments in strategic, sustainable business models. A quantitative longitudinal correlational strategy was used for the exploratory investigation. Sustainalytics, a prominent environmental, social, and governance (ESG) research agency in the sector, compiled the CSR rankings. The rankings were based on the following four criteria: Overall score, governance, social justice, and environment. All Canadian corporations’ financial data were stored in the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR). To conduct multiple linear regressions on 61 observations spanning fiscal years 2009–2017, secondary data were collected and imported into Microsoft Excel 2013. The designs illustrate the interplay between the Toronto Stock Exchange’s (TSX’s) fundamental industries and how CSR relates to revenues from markets outside of Canada. The results showed a strong correlation between adopting CSR strategies and income from markets outside the country. The research found that their financial performance improved when companies adopted CSR practices. Policymakers and business executives in Canada who are considering the possibility of a free trade agreement with the EU may find this helpful report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".