Advancing Genetic Alphabet Expansion: Synthesis of 7‐(2‐Thienyl)‐Imidazo[4,5‐b]pyridine (Ds) and 4‐(4‐Pentyne‐1,2‐diol)‐1‐Propynyl‐2‐Nitropyrrole (Diol‐Px) for Use in Replicable Unnatural Base Pairs for PCR Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expanding the genetic alphabet enhances DNA recombinant technologies by introducing unnatural base pairs (UBPs) beyond the standard A-T and G-C pairs, leading to biomaterials with novel and increased functionalities. Recent developments include UBPs that effectively function as a third base pair in replication, transcription, and/or translation processes. One such UBP, Ds-Px, demonstrates extremely high specificity in replication. Chemically synthesized DNA fragments containing Ds bases are amplified by PCR with the 5'-triphosphates of Ds and Px deoxyribonucleosides (dDsTP and dPxTP). The Ds-Px pair system has applications in enhanced DNA data storage, generation of high-affinity DNA aptamers, and incorporation of functional elements into RNA through transcription. This protocol describes the synthesis of the amidite derivative of Ds (dDs amidite), the triphosphate dDsTP, and the diol-modified dPxTP (Diol-dPxTP) for PCR amplifications involving the Ds-Px pair. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Synthesis of Ds deoxyribonucleoside (dDs) Basic Protocol 2: Synthesis of dDs amidite Basic Protocol 3: Synthesis of dDs triphosphate (dDsTP) Basic Protocol 4: Synthesis of Pn deoxyribonucleoside (4-iodo-dPn) Basic Protocol 5: Synthesis of acetyl-protected diol-modified Px deoxyribonucleoside (Diol-dPx) Basic Protocol 6: Synthesis of Diol-dPx triphosphate (Diol-dPxTP) Basic Protocol 7: Purification of triphosphates Support Protocol 1: Synthesis of Hoffer's chlorosugar Support Protocol 2: Preparation of 0.5 M pyrophosphate in DMF Support Protocol 3: Preparation of 2 M TEAB buffer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".