MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393950233 · doi:10.1007/s12274-024-6592-7

A bifunctional nitrile additive for high-performance lithiumoxygen batteries

2024· article· en· W4393950233 on OpenAlexaff
Ziwei Li, Yue Yu, Dong‐Yue Yang, Jin Wang, Gang Huang, Tong Liu, Xinbo Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifunctionalNitrileChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Li-O2 batteries with high energy density hold significant promise as next-generation energy storage systems. However, Li-O2 batteries have poor cycling performance at high current densities and large capacities, primarily due to the high impedance caused by the instability of the lithium anode and the sluggish kinetics in the discharge products decomposition on the cathode. Herein, we investigated a bifunctional nitrile additive (2-methoxy benzonitrile (2-MBN)) with good chemical/electrochemical stability to improve the performances of Li-O2 batteries. The 2-MBN could actively modify the anode by ensuring uniform Li+ deposition and optimizing the composition of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Meanwhile, it could also facilitate the decomposition of discharge products by inducing the formation of sheet-like Li2O2, significantly reducing the battery charge overpotential. The bifunctional effects of 2-MBN for the anode and cathode enable Li-O2 batteries to achieve a stable lifetime of 97 cycles at a current density of 600 mA·g−1 with a fixed capacity of 2000 mAh·g−1, much better than that of Li-O2 batteries without 2-MBN (28 cycles). The inclusion of 2-MBN provides an effective approach for attaining high-performance Li-O2 batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano ResearchSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207