The impact of real-time carbon dioxide awareness on occupant behavior and ventilation rates in student dwellings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although existing standards typically prescribe fixed ventilation rates, a large portion of the building stock lacks mechanical ventilation systems. Such buildings obtain outdoor air through unintentional infiltration, open windows, and the operation of exhaust fans, which are mainly dependent on user awareness and behavior. This study investigates whether the presence of a simple CO2 meter display can alter user behavior and improve indoor air quality (IAQ) in dwellings. We conducted a two-week monitoring of CO2 concentration, air temperature, and relative humidity in 60 student dwellings (bedrooms and living rooms) in Denmark and Switzerland. During the first week, the CO2 display was concealed, and occupants adhered to their usual routines. In the second week, occupants used the display's visual feedback to enhance IAQ when necessary. Results revealed that over 95% of dwellings witnessed a reduction in median CO2 levels during the second week, both overall and in individual rooms. Furthermore, a descriptive analysis of CO2 concentration step changes exceeding the thresholds of “normal variation” showed an increase in the number of negative step changes, indicating a shift in user behavior. These findings underscore the efficacy ofa display interface providing information on the indoor environment in triggering behavior changes and improving IAQ in dwellings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".