MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393970823 · doi:10.1002/9781119678892.ch8

FIBER OPTIC SENSORS BASED ON THE SAGNAC INTERFEROMETER AND PASSIVE RING RESONATOR

2024· other· en· W4393970823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometrySagnac effectResonatorOptical fiberOpticsFiber optic sensorRing (chemistry)Fibre optic gyroscopePhysicsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sagnac interferometers and passive ring resonators can be used to sense a wide range of environmental phenomena. This chapter begins with an introduction to the use of the Sagnac interferometer and passive ring resonator for rotation sensing. This includes an introduction to the Sagnac effect and continues with a discussion of its first commercial implementation in the form of the ring laser gyro. The chapter describes fiber optic gyros in both the Sagnac interferometer and passive ring resonator configurations for open- and closed-loop operation. Optical rotation sensors have made substantial progress in replacing conventional mechanical rotation sensors based on the principle of inertia of spinning masses. In contrast to the ring laser and passive ring resonator gyros that measure the Sagnac effect due to changes in the optical path length of a single circuit, the fiber optic gyro measures the Sagnac effect in a fiber coil having many turns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyFrench-language works237,207