MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Systematic Review of NT-proBNP as Prognostic Biomarker for Preeclampsia Complications

2024· review· en· W4393971632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Adrianes Bachnas, Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin, Agni Shalha Ali, Ardhia Fefrine Indarta, Shafira Yasmine Anshari, Ratih Puspita Febrinasari, Vitri Widyaningsih

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Maternal and Child Health · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Sebelas Maret
KeywordsPreeclampsiaBiomarkerMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyIntensive care medicinePregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Preeclampsia can lead to maternal and fetal complications due to its ability to cause multiple organ disorders. Interestingly, N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were higher in preeclampsia than in non-preeclampsia, representing cardiovascular mal¬function as the potential cause. Moreover, NT-proBNP also has a potential role in predicting complications that will arise in preeclampsia. This systematic review was performed to determine the role of NT-proBNP plasma levels in predicting maternal and fetal complications in preeclampsia.Subjects and Method: This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA-P by previous observational study from scientific databases, namely Hinari, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and grey literature in OCLC’s OAISTER between 2006 and 2021. The search keyword used were ((NTproBNP) OR (NT-proBNP) OR (N-terminal pro-BNP) OR (N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide)) AND ((preeclampsia) OR (pre-eclampsia)) AND (pregnancy complications). Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used to assess quality of included studies.Results: After study selection, five studies from 156 studies were considered eligible and selected in this systematic review. The results showed that pre-eclampsia complications occurred with NT-proBNP levels above 500 mg/dL, which cardiovascular complications may occurred above 700 mg/dL. NT-proBNP levels were higher in women with maternal complications such as placental abruption, HELLP (Hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet levels) syndrome, eclampsia, pulmonary oedema, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal dysfunction, and hypertensive retinopathy. Furthermore, increased NT-proBNP levels were associated with fetal growth restriction, resulting in low birth weight. NT-proBNP was significantly higher in pregnant women due to a combination of pre-existing volume overload and NT-proBNP clearance dysfunction in kidney. Conclusion: NT-proBNP levels were associated with adverse outcomes in preeclampsia. NT-proBNP serum levels could be used to predict maternal-fetal complications in preeclampsia. Keywords: preeclampsia, fetal, maternal, complications, NT-proBNP Correspondence: Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. E-mail: aimanhilmi02@student.uns.ac.id. Phone number: +62 85726562060.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Maternal and Child HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207