MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393981899 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2455_03

Avoiding dam failures: is filtration the best solution?

2024· article· en· W4393981899 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy Fitton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiltration (mathematics)Computer scienceReliability engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tailings storage has been marred with numerous catastrophic tailings dam failures in recent decades, resulting in hundreds of deaths and significant environmental damage. The mining industry has sought to develop and implement alternative methods of tailings storage in an attempt to limit the risks associated with dammed storage. Underground storage of tailings slurries and pastes has provided a partial solution at mines with underground workings, but this typically enables only a minor percentage of the total tailings stream to be stored. It can therefore not be considered a total solution for most mines, and still leaves the majority of the tailings requiring a dedicated storage facility above ground. Canadian professor Eli Robinsky introduced his concept of thickened discharge in the 1970s, featuring the central thickened discharge scheme for flat terrain and the down valley discharge scheme for steep and sloping terrain. This approach has been successfully implemented at more than 60 mines around the world with no reported major geotechnical failures or major environmental damage to date. Manufacturers of filter presses and other filtration devices have gradually developed larger equipment that can process greater volumes more economically. In recent years, more attention has been focused on the use of filtration technology for tailings storage, with some workers suggesting that it provides the ultimate solution for tailings storage in terms of the geotechnical stability and closure advantages. Geotextile tubes have also been presented as a possible damless tailings storage solution. This paper discusses the relative risks and advantages between filtered tailings and thickened discharge for tailings storage. The reliability of the technology, the cost of installation and operation, the geotechnical stability of the deposited tailings, the environmental impacts, the closure of the tailings storage facility, and the record to date for each of these two technologies will be compared and discussed. Finally, the paper questions the popularity of conventional tailings dams, and why alternative technologies like thickened discharge and filter stacking are not being more widely used instead of conventional dams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207