MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT184: First-in-human trial of TIGIT inhibitor M6223 as monotherapy or in combination with bintrafusp alfa (BA) in patients (pts) with advanced solid unresectable tumors

2024· article· en· W4393985505 on OpenAlexaff
Aung Naing, Meredith McKean, Anthony W. Tolcher, Anja Victor, Ping Hu, Keyvan Tadjalli Mehr, Thomas Kitzing, Daniel J. Holland, Emilia Richter, Lillian L. Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSolid tumorTIGITOncologyInternal medicineCancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: M6223 is an intravenous (IV), fully human, antagonistic, anti-TIGIT antibody with an Fc-mediated effector region. In preclinical studies, M6223 combined with BA (a bifunctional fusion protein that simultaneously targets the TGF-β and PD-(L)1 pathways) enhanced antitumor efficacy compared to either agent alone. Methods: This first-in-human, dose escalation study of M6223 as monotherapy (M6223; Part 1A) or in combination with BA (M6223+BA; Part 1B) included pts with advanced solid tumors (aged ≥18 years, ECOG PS ≤1) (NCT04457778). In Part 1A, pts received M6223 at 10 mg, 30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, 900 mg, 1600 mg, 2400 mg (all Q2W) or M6223 2400 mg Q3W. In Part 1B, pts received M6223 at 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1600 mg, all in combination with BA 1200 mg (both Q2W, IV). Dose escalation decisions by the Safety Monitoring Committee were assisted by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose for expansion (RDE). Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical activity. Results: At final analysis, 40 pts (21 male, age range 24-79 years) had received M6223 (Q2W: n=32; Q3W: n=8), and 18 pts (7 male, age range 34-80 years) had received M6223+BA. Overall, two dose-limiting toxicities were observed: a grade 3 adrenal insufficiency (M6223, 900 mg) and a grade 3 anemia (M6223+BA, 300 mg; unrelated to M6223). In the M6223 group, grade ≥3 TEAEs were observed in 14 (35.0%) pts and M6223-related grade ≥3 TEAEs in 2 (5.0%) pts. In the M6223+BA group, grade ≥3 TEAEs were observed in 14 (77.8%) pts and M6223-related grade ≥3 TEAEs in 4 (22.2%) pts. No MTD was identified. RDEs were 1600 mg Q2W or 2400 mg Q3W for M6223 monotherapy, and 1600 mg+1200 mg Q2W for M6223+BA. Half-life for the two monotherapy RDEs were 9.0 and 14.6 days, respectively, with moderate accumulation at the selected RDEs. Linear PK was observed for M6223 at 100-2400 mg Q2W and at 2400 mg Q3W; co-administration with BA did not change the PK profile of M6223. PD analyses in blood showed full and sustained TIGIT target occupancy, and depletion of suppressive Tregs at M6223 ≥900 mg. Paired biopsies in the M6223 group (900 mg Q2W, 1600 mg Q2W, 2400 mg Q3W; n=12) showed a trend of decrease in TIGIT+ and increase in CD226+ cells. Median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 4.9, 12.0) and median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3, 1.8). No pt achieved an objective response (per RECIST v1.1); stable disease as the best response was observed in 13 (32.5%) pts in M6223 and 5 (27.8%) pts in M6223+BA. Conclusion: M6223 monotherapy and in combination with BA had a manageable safety profile, and RDEs for both mono- and combination therapy were defined. Further evaluation of M6223 is ongoing in combination with PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab (JAVELIN Bladder Medley; NCT05327530). Citation Format: Aung Naing, Meredith McKean, Anthony Tolcher, Anja Victor, Ping Hu, Keyvan Tadjalli Mehr, Thomas Kitzing, Daniel Holland, Emilia Richter, Lillian Siu. First-in-human trial of TIGIT inhibitor M6223 as monotherapy or in combination with bintrafusp alfa (BA) in patients (pts) with advanced solid unresectable tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT184.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207