Abstract CT146: AZD0466 in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Efficacy and safety in an open-label phase 1 trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Overexpression of pro-survival proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL have been associated with poor prognosis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). AZD0466 is a drug-dendrimer conjugate consisting of the dual Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor AZD4320 covalently conjugated to a pegylated poly-L-lysine dendrimer, which allows for gradual release by hydrolysis. Preclinically, AZD0466 monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in xenograft models of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here, we report results from a Phase 1 trial (NCT05205161) of AZD0466 in relapsed/refractory (R/R) advanced B-cell NHL (B-NHL). Methods Eligible patients were ≥18 years old and had received 2-5 prior lines of therapy. AZD0466 was administered intravenously, with a dose ramp-up on days 1 and 4 of a 28-day cycle, and weekly administration of the target dose from day 8. The primary objective of the dose escalation phase was to assess the safety and tolerability of AZD0466 in patients with R/R B-NHL and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated using Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary objective was evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for the study drug. Results As of November 02, 2023, 7 patients (DLBCL n=5, follicular lymphoma n=1, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=1; median age, 57 [26−79] years) had received AZD0466 at 600 mg (n=3), 1200 mg (n=3), or 2400 mg (n=1). All patients experienced adverse events (AEs). AEs possibly related to AZD0466 were reported in 6 patients, most common: platelet count decrease (57.1%), neutropenia/neutrophil count decrease (42.9%), and hypophosphatemia (28.6%). Grade ≥3 AEs possibly related to AZD0466 were reported in 4 patients: 2 Grade 3 and 1 Grade 4 neutropenia/neutrophil count decrease, and 2 AEs that led to treatment discontinuation (Grade 3 platelet count decrease and dose-limiting Grade 3 troponin increase). Among 6 evaluable patients across all dose levels, 1 patient with MZL treated at 1200 mg had an objective response (partial response). Another 3 patients had a best overall response of stable disease and 2 patients had progressive disease. One patient discontinued the study prior to disease assessment. AZD4320 exposure was dose-proportional, with PK profiles similar to studies with other hematologic malignancies. As a surrogate of Bcl-xL on-target activity, transient thrombocytopenia with moderate platelet count recovery prior to the next dose was observed in most patients, in line with preclinical modeling. Pharmacodynamic modulation based on cleaved caspase-3 induction by AZD0466 was observed at 1200 and 2400 mg. Conclusion AZD0466 ≤1200 mg was clinically well tolerated but evidence of asymptomatic myocardial injury was observed at 2400 mg. The study was terminated due to similar findings in a concurrent trial (D8241C00001; NIMBLE). With an objective response observed at the 1200 mg dose level, further development of agents targeting Bcl-2/xL in NHL is warranted with efforts to reduce the cardiotoxicity profile. Citation Format: Geoffrey Chong, Franck Morschhauser, Alex Herrera, Ki-Seong Eom, Tae Min Kim, Michael Wang, Connor Hall, Fathima Zumla Cader, Kaitlyn Beyfuss, Patricia Cheung, Wei Quan, Shringi Sharma, Yotvat Marmor, Jamal Saeh, Jose Mariz. AZD0466 in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Efficacy and safety in an open-label phase 1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT146.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".