Correlation of in vitro cell viability and cumulative singlet oxygen luminescence from protoporphyrin IX in mitochondria and plasma membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be targeted toward different subcellular localizations, and it is proposed that different subcellular targets vary in their sensitivity to photobiological damage. Since singlet oxygen (1O2) has a very short lifetime with a limited diffusion length in cellular environments, measurement of cumulative 1O2 luminescence is the most direct approach to compare the PDT sensitivity of mitochondria and plasma membrane. PDT-generated near-infrared 1O2 luminescence at 1270 nm was measured together with cell viability for 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) and exogenous PpIX, at different incubation times. Confocal fluorescence microscopy indicated that ALA-induced PpIX (2 h) localized in the mitochondria, whereas exogenous PpIX (1 h) mainly localized to the plasma membrane. Cell viability was determined at several time points during PDT treatments using colony-forming assays, and the surviving fraction correlated well with cumulative 1O2 luminescence counts from PpIX in mitochondria and plasmas membrane, respectively. The mitochondria are more sensitive than the plasma membrane by a factor of 1.7. Direct 1O2 luminescence dosimetry's potential value for comparing the PDT sensitivity of different subcellular organelles was demonstrated. This could be useful for developing subcellular targeted novel photosensitizers to enhance PDT efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".