MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394062135 · doi:10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.459

Surgery vs. Local injections in Carpal Tunnel syndrome. Study in Routine Clinical Practice in a Primary Care Centre

2024· article· en· W4394062135 on OpenAlexaff
Domingo Ly‐Pen, José Luis Andreu Sánchez, Isabel Millán, Alberto Sánchez‐Olaso, Gema de Blas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarpal tunnel syndromePrimary careSurgeryCarpal tunnel releaseClinical PracticePhysical therapyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent entrapment neuropathy that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Traditional treatment modalities include local corticosteroid injections (I) and surgery (S), with varying degrees of efficacy reported in the literature. Despite numerous studies, the relative effectiveness of these treatments in routine clinical practice remains inadequately explored. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of local injections versus surgery in the treatment of CTS within a primary care context, emphasizing the outcomes in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: This prospective observational study included 160 naïve patients with idiopathic CTS treated in the 4th Sanitary Area of Madrid. Participants were allocated to receive either local injections of triamcinolone acetonide (I) or surgical treatment (S) based on patient-physician consensus. The primary outcomes measured were changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Functional Status Scale, and Symptoms Severity Scale from baseline to 6 and 26 weeks post-treatment. Statistical significance was determined using Student's T-test and paired samples T-test. Results: At baseline, both groups were comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. By the 6-week follow-up, the I group demonstrated a significant reduction in pain VAS (56.2, CI 50.9–61.6, p<0.001), improved functional status (1.25, CI 1.08–1.43, p<0.001), and decreased symptoms severity (1.97, CI 1.79–2.16, p<0.001) compared to the S group. However, at the 26-week follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in pain VAS reduction (I: 52.8, CI 46.1–59.4 vs. S: 46.3, CI 39.3–53.3, p=0.196), functional status improvement (I: 1.16, CI 0.95–1.36 vs. S: 1.24, CI 0.99–1.48, p=0.601), or symptoms severity decrease (I: 1.88, CI 1.64–2.13 vs. S: 1.96, CI 1.70–2.21, p=0.662). Conclusion: In the short term, local corticosteroid injections offer a significant advantage over surgery in alleviating the symptoms of CTS, as evidenced by improvements in pain, functional status, and symptoms severity. However, these differences diminish over time, with both treatments showing comparable effectiveness at 26 weeks. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment strategies in managing CTS and underscore the potential for early intervention in a primary care setting to effectively address this condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207