Cadomian crust of Eastern Iran: evidence from the Tapeh Tagh granitic gneisses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Late Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian (Cadomian) magmatic rocks are abundant in Iran, but their occurrence in east-central Iran is voluminous. This paper reports, for the first time, on the Cadomian rocks of the eastern Iranian region known as Tapeh Tagh and deals with their geochemistry and uranium-lead (U-Pb) zircon ages. The Tapeh Tagh region contains masses of Cadomian meta-igneous rocks (including various types of granitic gneiss) and overlying meta-sedimentary rocks. The granitic gneisses show tectonic contact with metasedimentary rocks and their connection appears to have been obscured during the younger tectonic movements. The granitic gneisses show mylonitic texture with quartz ribbons and feldspar augen. Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry U-Pb dating of zircon grains, separated from medium to coarse-grained gneissic rocks, consistently yielded near concordant to discordant pairs of 527 ± 5 and 522 ± 10 Ma. Geochemically, these rocks show a felsic composition with SiO2 content varying from 70.30 to 79.63 wt.%, a high content of FeO(t), alkalis, and incompatible trace elements (Zr, Nb), along with high ratios of Ga/Al and FeO(t)/MgO. They have fractionated rare earth element (REE) patterns with La/Yb = 9.1–24.7. Eu shows depletion with Eu/Eu*<1. The highly fractionated granites of the Tapeh Tagh are geochemically classified into the volcanic arc granites (VAG) and within plate granite.The granitic gneisses are geochemically and geochronologically similar to other Cadomian granites and gneisses in other parts of Iran as well as the Cadomian magmatic rocks from Turkey. These widely disseminated Cadomian basement rocks in Iran and Turkey are considered as fragments of Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian continental arcs that formed the northern active margin of Gondwanaland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".