MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394141636 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1597210

Exploring the Relationship amongst Interacting Plant Communities of Solidago canadensis and Symphyotrichum ericoides as Distance from a Water Source Increases

2015· dataset· en· W4394141636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cathy Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidago canadensisPlant communityGeographyEnvironmental scienceBotanyBiologyInvasive species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to better understand the relationship between plant height and distance from a water source, a study was conducted on successive weeks during the afternoons (from 2:30PM to 5:00PM EST) of October 1st, 8th and 15th 2015 at York University’s Keele campus (43° 46' 9.228"N, 79° 30' 29.556’’W). We selected three sources of water (Stong Pond, Black Creek Pond and Dan Iannuzzi Park Pond) with similar characteristics in terms of surrounding herbaceous vegetation (all three locations were dominated by herbaceous perennial plants), canopy coverage (little to no canopy coverage), and elevation gradients and soil types. The two plants in question were the Symphyotrichum ericoides (white aster) and the Solidago canadensis (Canadian goldenrod), both of which are native to North America. A stratified random sampling procedure was adopted where the area surrounding each water source was stratified into three concentric categories based on soil type: dry, weathered and wet (Figure 2). Soil types at approximately 3 m were considered “wet,” at 12 m “weathered” and at 15 m “dry.” These three strata were visually identified based on a consensus of all four observers in the study, in order to minimize estimate errors due to observer bias. At all three locations, one line transect was transversed at the most shallow edge of the pond. A one by one meter quadrat was then placed from the point where the transect ends. The direction of quadrat placement for each stratum was determined through a randomization procedure, using a random number table on Microsoft Excel. In each sample plot, the following variables were measured: plant height and distance from water source. Plant height was measured using a second transect, where we measured from the base of the stem to the apical bud. Plants measured along quadrat margins were included if more than half of the rooted system was visibly inside the quadrat. Three replicate plots were sampled for each stratum, at each location, resulting in a total of 81 replicates. Mean temperature and precipitation during the month of October in southern Ontario ranged from 14-18 °C and 64 mm, respectively. We conducted statistical tests using SPSS where the independent variable was distance from water source and the dependent variable was plant height. We performed a one-way ANOVA to compare differences in plant height as distance from the water source increased, based on soil type. Means were separated by application of the Tukey post-hoc test. We considered there to be no significance when the value of the probability of significance (p-value) was greater than 0.05. To further test whether there were differences in growth between the two species, regardless if one was inherently smaller than the other, we used a two-tailed, independent sample t-test assuming equal variance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.082 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207