NEDD9 Mediates the FAK/Src Signaling Pathway to Promote the Adhesion of Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells after Dexamethasone Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The differential gene expression of neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 9 (NEDD9) in human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells after dexamethasone (Dex) treatment was confirmed through gene expression profiling. However, the regulatory mechanism of NEDD9 expression in HTM cells remains unknown. In this study, we investigated NEDD9 expression in HTM cells and gained a better understanding of glucocorticoid-induced glaucoma (GIG) pathophysiology. The Gene Expression Omnibus database and GEO2R tool were used to identify differentially expressed genes in the GSE37474 and GSE124114 datasets, and NEDD9 gene expression was found to be upregulated. Human corneoscleral segments and HTM cells were treated with 100 nM Dex or an equal volume of ethanol (0.01%) for 7 days. NEDD9 expression in TM tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and NEED9 expression in HTM cells was confirmed by RT-qPCR and western blotting. HTM cell adhesive behaviors were assessed with a cell adhesion detection kit. NEDD9 expression was knocked down with short hairpin RNA in HTM cells, and FAK/Src signaling pathway activation was found to be regulated by NEDD9. After 7 days of HTM cell Dex treatment, NEDD9 expression was upregulated to be approximately twice that of control. FAK, Src, phospho-FAK, and phospho-Src expression in Dex-treated HTM cells was markedly increased. Downregulation of NEDD9 expression reduced HTM cell adhesion to the surface of culture wells and simultaneously led to a reduction in FAK, Src, phospho-FAK and phospho-Src expression. NEDD9 expression is upregulated in HTM cells after Dex treatment and promotes HTM cell adhesion. These findings underscore the contribution of NEDD9 overexpression to altered HTM cell adhesion during glucocorticoid therapy and may play a key role in GIG pathological progression. Considering the similarity between GIG and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), our findings suggest that targeting NEDD9 may be a new therapeutic strategy for POAG patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".