MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394281186 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21984866

Sanger sequencing and ddPCR raw data files (A species-specific digital PCR assay for the endangered blue racer in Canada)

2023· dataset· en· W4394281186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orianne Tournayre

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanger sequencingEndangered speciesDigital polymerase chain reactionBiologyComputational biologyGeographyDNA sequencingPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsEcologyDNAGeneHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manuscript title: A species-specific digital PCR assay for the endangered blue racer in Canada Authors: Orianne Tournayre, Ryan Wolfe, Hannah McCurdy-Adams, Amy A. Chabot and Stephen C.Lougheed Data: 349360_chromats.zip (".ab1" files) : raw cytochrome b (cytb) sequences and chromatograms of 13 blue racer individuals collected on Pelee Island (Canada, see Table S1 for more information). Sequencing was done at the Centre for Applied Genomics (Toronto, Canada) using the L14910 (de Queiroz et al. 2002) and ColSeq1F (Burbrink et al. 2008) primers. ". ddpcr" files: ddPCR raw data generated using a Bio-Rad QX200™ AutoDG™Droplet Digital™ PCR System and direct quantification mode in the QX Manager 2.0 Standard Edition software (BioRad, Saint-Laurent, QC,Canada) In_vitro_data_ 20221214_145436_565.ddpcr : Standard concentration 1 Standard concentration 2: 1/2 dilution Standard concentration 3: 1/4 dilution Standard concentration 4: 1/8 dilution Standard concentration 5: 1/16 dilution Standard concentration 6: 1/32 dilution Standard concentration 7: 1/64 dilution Standard concentration 8: 1/128 dilution Standard concentration 9: 1/256 dilution Standard concentration 10: 1/512 dilution Standard concentration 11: 1/1024 dilution Standard concentration 12: 1/2048 dilution Standard concentration 13: 1/4096 dilution Standard concentration 14: 1/8192 dilution Standard concentration 15: 1/16384 dilution LOD_LOQ_data_20230113_145859_903.ddpcr In_situ_data_20221220_134107_549.ddpcr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207