MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394327924 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21081241

Vegetative cell enlargement in selected centric diatom species – an alternative way to propagate an individual genotype

2022· dataset· en· W4394327924 on OpenAlexaff
Irena Kaczmarska, James M. Ehrman, Kelsey E. Mills, Steven G. Sutcliffe, B. Samanta

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatomGenotypeResizingBiologyEcologyGeneticsGeneBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vegetative cell enlargement (VCE) and structures involved are documented for the first time using epifluorescence and electron microscopy. We examined three centric diatom species with polar and non-polar valve outlines. VCE progressed in two ways. The first involved liberation of the protoplast, nearly isodiametric expansion, and building of the large frustule in a more or less spherical cell. Protoplast retraction as observed in sexual auxospores before the formation of initial valves was never observed. Cell walls produced a variety of scales, including valve-like scales before the first enlarged epivalve was deposited. VCE wall structures were not similar to auxospore walls of the same species. The morphology of the first enlarged valve, the epivalve, differed from that of typical vegetative valves to a varying degree, depending on the species. The second way to vegetatively enlarge cells involved expansion of the girdle region of the existing small frustule. The circumference of the girdle region grew due to the deposition of irregular, supernumerary copulae. These copulae produced one or more protuberances, resulting in a misshapen cell. This misshapen cell then divided mitotically, and the first enlarged valve was a hypovalve. Hypovalve morphology strongly differed from that of typical vegetative valves. Several subsequent mitotic divisions were required to restore normal, species-specific frustules. Over time, irrespective of the manner of enlargement, the enlarged cells grew well and eventually became more frequent than small cells in our cultures. The scale factors of enlarged cells compared with pre-enlargement size in our experiments (1.1–5.2) were similar to those reported for other species (1.4–7.5). Additionally, we found that size increases from VCE were comparable to those resulting from sexual reproduction of the same species. Therefore, VCE can potentially expand the resident time of the population in the environment to the same degree as would production of sexual initial cells. Species vegetatively restore large cell size in different ways.Scale factors in sexually and vegetatively enlarged cells are similar.VCE may not be as rare as reported in nature. Species vegetatively restore large cell size in different ways. Scale factors in sexually and vegetatively enlarged cells are similar. VCE may not be as rare as reported in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207