CCNE1 is a potential target of Metformin for tumor suppression of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and malignant type of ovarian cancer, accounting for 70%–80% of mortality. However, the treatment of HGSOC has improved little in the past few decades. Metformin is the first-line medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and has now gained more attention in cancer treatment. In this study, we sought to identify potential hub genes that metformin could target in the treatment of HGSOC. We downloaded GSE69428 and GSE69429 in the Gene Expression Omnibus database and performed the bioinformatics analysis. Subsequently, we analyzed the effect of Metformin in HGSOC through biological experiments. Molecular simulation docking was used to predict the interaction of Metformin and CCNE1. We chose CCNE1 for the study based on bioinformatics analysis, literature studies, and preliminary data. We evaluated that CCNE1 is overexpressed in HGSOC tissues and found that HGSOC cells with high CCNE1 expression increase sensitivity to Metformin treatment in the analysis of cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. Metformin could inhibit the expression of CCNE1, which is associated with the anti-proliferative effect of tumor cells. Moreover, Metformin could ameliorate the tumor growth in syngeneic orthotopic transplantation mouse models and xenograft tumorigenesis models. Furthermore, molecular simulation docking showed that Metformin may bind to CCNE1 protein, suggesting that CCNE1 could be a potential target for Metformin. Our data revealed that Metformin has antitumor effects on ovarian cancer and CCNE1 could be a potential target for Metformin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.191 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".