MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394453894 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13622558

Establishment and analysis of a novel miRNA prognostic risk model for bladder cancer based on TCGA database

2021· dataset· zh· W4394453894 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaojie Ang

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedataset
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsBladder cancermicroRNADatabaseOncologyComputer scienceInternal medicineMedicineCancerBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

膀胱癌是最常见的泌尿道肿瘤,并且由于缺乏可靠的诊断标记物,大多数膀胱癌被诊断为晚期。本研究在TCGA数据库中分析了膀胱癌患者的转录组和临床数据,经过预处理后将其分为试验组和验证组。首先,通过单变量Cox回归分析确定与膀胱癌预后密切相关的miRNA,然后通过多变量Cox回归分析建立基于miRNA表达谱的预后风险模型。通过ROC分析确定患者分类风险水平的最佳分界点,并在验证组和整个组中通过Kaplan-Meier估计来验证预后风险评分类型。 从miRTarBase,targetScan和miRDB的三个miRNA库中至少选择了两个可能的靶基因,并进行了KEGG途径和GO富集分析。所有这些交叉基因都是通过PPI网络和生存分析构建的。最后,建立了5-miRNA(hsa-miR-338-5p,hsa-miR-218-1-3p,hsa-miR-17-3p,hsa-miR-6728-5p,hsa-miR-10a- 3p)已成功构建。多变量Cox分析显示,它具有良好的可预测性,可作为预测膀胱癌患者预后和生存的新生物标志物,并可通过IGF1发挥其生物学功能。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207