Triassic igneous activities in the east flank of the East Kunlun orogenic belt: the Daheba complex example
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Triassic igneous complexes in the east flank of the East Kunlun orogenic belt (E-KOB) provide a window through which to investigate the Mesozoic magmatism in the E-KOB. Here, we report the precise timing of Triassic magmatism and magma petrogenesis of different rock types in the east flank of the E-KOB based on the petrology, mineral chemistry, geochemistry, zircon geochronology and Lu-Hf isotopes. Zircon U-Pb dating reveals that the Daheba complex was crystallized in 242–239 Ma. The rocks display enrichment in large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and LREEs and depletion in high field strength elements (HFSEs) and HREEs, which are typical of subduction-related magmatic rocks. The fine-grained granites (FGs) are characterized by a high SiO<sub>2</sub> content (72.25–74.28 wt. %), a high differentiation index (DI = 95) and marked depletion in Sr, Ba and Eu, which indicates that the FGs are highly fractionated I-type granitoids. The zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values from −3.6 to −1.1 with two-stage model ages (T<sub>DM2</sub>) of 1496–1340 Ma, which suggests that they were derived from an ancient Mesoproterozoic lower crust. The similarity in the REE patterns of the mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) and host granites (HGs) indicates that the mixing between mafic and felsic magmas could have contributed to the chemical variation of the MMEs. The mafic melts were derived from the partial melting of the mantle that had been metasomatized by slab-derived fluids. The MMEs show typical igneous textures, acicular apatites, sieve texture of plagioclase and reverse zoning of plagioclase, which correspond to magma mixing during petrogenesis. Our geochemical and isotopic data suggest that the Daheba complex formed in an active continental margin setting closely related to the northward subduction of the Palaeo-Tethys Ocean Plate beneath the E-KOB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.149 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".