MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394554857 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3117316

New Occurrences of <i>Oldhamia</i> in Eastern Yukon, Canada: Stratigraphic Context and Implications for Cambrian Deep-Marine Biostratigraphy

2016· dataset· en· W4394554857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R B MacNaughton, David P. Moynihan, C F Roots, James L. Crowley

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiostratigraphyPaleontologyGeologyContext (archaeology)Deep time

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For over a century, the ichnogenus Oldhamia has been used as an index fossil for Cambrian deep-marine siliciclastic successions. New specimens from the Cambrian of Selwyn Basin, eastern Yukon, Canada, provide an opportunity to constrain the chronostratigraphic range of Oldhamia and test its potential for more detailed biozonation. The upper part of Narchilla Formation (Arrowhead Lake Member) yields O. antiqua, O. curvata, O. flabellata, and O. radiata. The overlying Gull Lake Formation yields a less diverse assemblage of O. antiqua, O. curvata, and O. flabellata. The upward disappearance of O. radiata is consistent with models that infer increasing complexity of Oldhamia ichnospecies through time but may also be a function of limited sampling. Regional stratigraphic correlations suggest Oldhamia appeared in Arrowhead Lake Member during Cambrian Stage 3. Archaeocyathans and trilobites from Gull Lake Formation confirm that Oldhamia was present during Cambrian Stages 3 to 4. A younger age limit on Oldhamia in Selwyn Basin is provided by syn-volcanic detrital zircons recovered from the base of the overlying Old Cabin Formation, which yield an age of 499.89 ± 0.14 Ma (earliest Guzhangian). Oldhamia appears to be a reliable index fossil for Cambrian Series 2 and Series 3 in Selwyn Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→