MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394564244 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3384977

Self-Healing Effects in OAM Beams Observed on a 28 GHz Experimental Link

2024· article· en· W4394564244 on OpenAlexaff
Marek Klemes, Lan Hu, Gregory J. Bowles, M. Akbari, S. Thirakoune, Michael S. Schwartzman, Kevin Zhang, Tan Huy Ho, David Wessel, Wen Tong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLink (geometry)Computer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we document for the first time some of the effects of self-healing, a property of orbital-angular-momentum (OAM) or vortex beams, as observed on a millimeter-wave experimental communications link in an outdoors line-of-sight (LOS) scenario. The OAM beams have a helical phase and polarization structure, and have conical amplitude shape in the far field. The Poynting vectors of the OAM beams also possess helical structures, orthogonal to the corresponding helical phase-fronts. Due to such non-planar structure in the direction orthogonal to the beam axis, OAM beams are a subset of “structured light” beams. Such structured beams are known to possess self-healing properties when partially obstructed along their propagation axis, especially in their near fields, resulting in partial reconstruction of their structures at larger distances along their beam axis. Various theoretical rationales have been proposed to explain, model and experimentally verify the self-healing physical effects in structured optical beams, using various types of obstructions and experimental techniques. Based on these models, we hypothesize that any self-healing observed will be greater as the OAM order increases. Here we observe the self-healing effects for the first time in structured OAM radio beams, in terms of communication signals and channel parameters rather than beam structures. We capture the effects of partial near-field obstructions of OAM beams of different orders on the communications signals, and provide a physical rationale to substantiate that the self-healing effect was observed to increase with the order of OAM, agreeing with our hypothesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207