Prediction of immunochemotherapy response for diffuse large <scp>B</scp>‐cell lymphoma using artificial intelligence digital pathology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous and prevalent subtype of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that poses diagnostic and prognostic challenges, particularly in predicting drug responsiveness. In this study, we used digital pathology and deep learning to predict responses to immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. We retrospectively collected 251 slide images from 216 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), with their immunochemotherapy response labels. The digital pathology images were processed using contrastive learning for feature extraction. A multi-modal prediction model was developed by integrating clinical data and pathology image features. Knowledge distillation was employed to mitigate overfitting on gigapixel histopathology images to create a model that predicts responses based solely on pathology images. Based on the importance derived from the attention mechanism of the model, we extracted histological features that were considered key textures associated with drug responsiveness. The multi-modal prediction model achieved an impressive area under the ROC curve of 0.856, demonstrating significant associations with clinical variables such as Ann Arbor stage, International Prognostic Index, and bulky disease. Survival analyses indicated their effectiveness in predicting relapse-free survival. External validation using TCGA datasets supported the model's ability to predict survival differences. Additionally, pathology-based predictions show promise as independent prognostic indicators. Histopathological analysis identified centroblastic and immunoblastic features to be associated with treatment response, aligning with previous morphological classifications and highlighting the objectivity and reproducibility of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis. This study introduces a novel approach that combines digital pathology and clinical data to predict the response to immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. This model shows great promise as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for clinical management of DLBCL. Further research and genomic data integration hold the potential to enhance its impact on clinical practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".