MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394606709 · doi:10.14740/jh1203

Hepatosplenic Alpha-Beta T-Cell Lymphoma: A Challenging Diagnostic Entity

2024· article· en· W4394606709 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abanoub Gabra, Joanna Polanco, Shrija Thapa, Sumit Sawhney, Alexey Glazyrin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancytopeniaMedicinePathologyLymphomaBone marrowEmperipolesisT-cell lymphomaCD8ImmunologyDiseaseImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is rare and clinically very aggressive T-cell lymphoma. The majority of cases harbor GAMMA DELTA T-cell receptors (TCRs); however, in some even rarer cases, tumor cells harbor αβ TCR. Recent studies suggest that αβ cases may have distinct morphological characteristics and demonstrate an even more aggressive course. In this case report, we demonstrated that in line with previous findings, αβ case of HSTCL had hemolytic presentation, demonstrated a very aggressive clinical course, and was unrelated to immunosuppression. Morphologically, tumor cells demonstrated diffuse growth pattern, blastoid morphology, and were CD8 + positive on the background of CD4 + small to medium reactive T cells. Additionally, the liver tumor cells demonstrated periportal localization, and in bone marrow, evidence of emperipolesis was noted. The latter finding may significantly contribute to pancytopenia characteristic, all types of HSTCL. Those unusual morphologic and clinical characteristics make diagnosis of this rare subtype of rare disease very challenging. More case analysis is required to establish whether αβ/γδ HSTCL are prognostically or morphologically significantly distinct entities. J Hematol. 2024;13(1-2):29-33 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jh1203

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesFrench-language works237,207