Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes among Patients Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Canadian Setting Using AI-Extracted Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are widely used in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC) in first line (1L), but little is known about their real-world use and clinical outcomes long-term, in Canada. This study used Pentavere's previously validated artificial intelligence (AI) to extract real-world data on the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients receiving CDK4/6i+endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC at Sinai Health in Toronto, Canada. Between 1 January 2016 and 1 July 2021, 48 patients were diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC and received CDK4/6i + ET. A total of 38 out of 48 patients received CDK4/6i + ET in 1L, of which 34 of the 38 (89.5%) received palbociclib + ET. In 2L, 12 of the 21 (57.1%) patients received CDK4/6i + ET, of which 58.3% received abemaciclib. In 3L, most patients received chemotherapy (10/12, 83.3%). For the patients receiving CDK4/6i in 1L, the median (95% CI) time to the next treatment was 42.3 (41.2, NA) months. The median (95% CI) time to chemotherapy was 46.5 (41.4, NA) months. The two-year overall survival (95% CI) was 97.4% (92.4, 100.0), and the median (range) follow-up was 28.7 (3.4-67.6) months. Despite the limitations inherent in real-world studies and a limited number of patients, these AI-extracted data complement previous studies, demonstrating the effectiveness of CDK4/6i + ET in the Canadian real-world 1L, with most patients receiving palbociclib as CDK4/6i in 1L.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".