MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Title: SYLVIAN FISSURE AND INSULAR LOBE DEPTH IN NORMAL PREGNANCY VERSUS INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION IN SEVERE PRE-ECLAMPSIA

2024· article· en· W4394613531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wafaa Aboulenein, Tamer Abd Aldayem, Nourhan Sakr

Bibliographic record

VenueALEXMED ePosters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEclampsiaPregnancyFissureIntrauterine growth restrictionTemporal lobeLobeMedicineObstetricsGeologyAnatomyEpilepsyGestationBiologyPsychiatryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Definitions of pre-eclampsia have varied throughout the times. ‎Improved understanding of the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia has influenced the ‎definitions. Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy specific condition diagnosed when ‎blood pressure is elevated above 140 mmHg systolic and/or 90 mmHg diastolic ‎and proteinuria over 0.3 mg per day after 20+0 weeks of gestation. Pre-eclampsia‎is commonly divided into early- and late-onset disease and preterm and term ‎subtypes based on the time of delivery or time of the diagnosis. The American ‎College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) proposed, in the Task Force ‎on Hypertension in gestation recommendations that, in the absence of proteinuria, ‎pre-eclampsia could be diagnosed when newly diagnosed hypertension occurs in ‎association with thrombocytopenia, impaired liver function, new development of ‎renal insufficiency, pulmonary oedema, or new onset cerebral or visual ‎disturbances. The Australasian Society for the Study of Hypertension and the ‎Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada have adopted even ‎broader definitions and include fetal features, such as fetal growth restriction, in ‎the definitions. ‎

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALEXMED ePosters→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→