Modeling and economic model predictive control of constrained cutterhead system with disturbance in tunnel boring machines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are usually the first choice for tunneling construction with its advantages on high safety, time saving, and less operators. Cutterhead system is an important component for TBMs since it is used to excavate rocks and soil. It is difficult to guarantee both the boring efficiency and energy saving under the excavating rock disturbances and the constraints on the driving motors in TBMs by manual operation. To deal with this problem, it is necessary to develop advanced control algorithms for the cutterhead system. Thus, we investigate an economic model predictive control (EMPC) structure for cutterhead system in TBMs. A generalized nonlinear dynamic model of TBM cutterhead system is built based on the first principle method. An economic cost is constructed with the boring efficiency and energy cost to evaluate the tunnel construction quality. EMPC algorithms are designed to optimize the constructed economic cost for a cutterhead system to guarantee good economic performance. It is shown that EMPC can improve the economic performance of the cutterhead system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".