MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394618940 · doi:10.1080/13816810.2024.2337879

Broadening the ocular phenotypic spectrum of ultra-rare <i>BRPF1</i> variants: report of two cases

2024· article· en· W4394618940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsStrabismusGeneticsPhenotypeAniridiaEpigeneticsGenePtosisBiologyMedicineOphthalmologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction BRPF1 gene on 3p26-p25 encodes a protein involved in epigenetic regulation, through interaction with histone H3 lysine acetyltransferases KAT6A and KAT6B of the MYST family. Heterozygous pathogenic variants in BRPF1 gene are associated with Intellectual Developmental Disorder with Dysmorphic Facies and Ptosis (IDDDFP), characterized by global developmental delay, intellectual disability, language delay, and dysmorphic facial features. The reported ocular involvement includes strabismus, amblyopia, and refraction errors. This report describes a novel ocular finding in patients affected by variants in the BRPF1 gene.Methods We performed exome sequencing and deep ocular phenotyping in two unrelated patients (P1, P2) with mild intellectual disability, ptosis, and typical facies.Results Interestingly, P1 had a Chiari Malformation type I and a subclinical optic neuropathy, which could not be explained by variations in other genes. Having detected a peculiar ocular phenotype in P1, we suggested optical coherence tomography (OCT) for P2; such an exam also detected bilateral subclinical optic neuropathy in this case.Discussion To date, only a few patients with BRPF1 variants have been described, and none were reported to have optic neuropathy. Since subclinical optic nerve alterations can go easily undetected, our experience highlights the importance of a more detailed ophthalmologic evaluation in patients with BRPF1 variant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it