Radio AGN Activity in Low Redshift Galaxies is Not Directly Related to Star Formation Rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine the demographics of radio-emitting active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the local universe as a function of host galaxy properties, most notably both stellar mass and star formation rate. Radio AGN activity is theoretically implicated in helping reduce star formation rates of galaxies, and therefore it is natural to investigate the relationship between these two galaxy properties. We use a sample of around 10, 000 galaxies from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) survey, part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV), along with the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty centimeters (FIRST) radio survey and the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) Very Large Array (VLA) Sky Survey (NVSS). There are 1,126 galaxies in MaNGA with radio detections. Using star formation rate and stellar mass estimates based on Pipe3D, inferred from the high signal-to-noise ratio measurements from MaNGA, we show that star formation rates are strongly correlated with 20 cm radio emission, as expected. We identify as radio AGN those radio emitters that are much stronger than expected from the star formation rate. Using this sample of AGN, the well-measured stellar velocity dispersions from MaNGA, and the black hole M-sigma relationship, we examine the Eddington ratio distribution and its dependence on stellar mass and star formation rate. We find that the Eddington ratio distribution depends strongly on stellar mass, with more massive galaxies having larger Eddington ratios. As found in previous studies, the AGN fraction increases rapidly with stellar mass. We do not find any dependence on star formation rate, specific star formation rate, or velocity dispersion when controlling for stellar mass. We conclude that galaxy star formation rates appear to be unrelated to the presence or absence of a radio AGN, which may be useful in constraining theoretical models of AGN feedback.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".