MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394711269 · doi:10.1109/tii.2024.3378832

Resilient Event-Triggered Observer-Based Periodic Wide-Area Control for Oscillation Damping in WAMPAC Systems Under Time Synchronization Attacks

2024· article· en· W4394711269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Oscillation (cell signaling)Control theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Computer scienceTime synchronizationControl systemReal-time computingControl (management)EngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we address the problem of delay-causing time synchronization (DC-TS) attacks against wide-area damping controllers (WADCs). To enhance smart grid stability against such threats, we present a realistic and secure design procedure for WADCs. To this end, we follow a methodology that utilizes the state-space model of the entire grid to design a periodic observer-based event-triggered controller by formulating the problem as a set of linear matrix inequalities, solved by the looped-Lyapunov functional (LLF) technique. The event-triggered scheme applied in this design procedure improves communication efficiency. Plus, the periodic sampled-data approach makes the design better suited to the operational reality of digital systems and their constraints. As such, the contributions of this work include developing an event-triggered mechanism to reduce unnecessary data transmissions, applying LLF for less conservative stability analysis, and utilizing the Guardian map theorem and Rekasius substitution to assess the WADCs resilience under DC-TS attacks. We conducted extensive simulations on the Kundur two-area and New England 39-bus systems to validate our approach. These simulations, along with comparisons to existing methods and tests on the RT-Lab real-time platform, demonstrate the superior performance of our WADC in maintaining grid stability and improving damping under considered attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it