MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394714140 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8199

Identification of Multiclass Pediatric Low-Grade Neuroepithelial Tumor Molecular Subtype with ADC MR Imaging and Machine Learning

2024· article· en· W4394714140 on OpenAlexafffund
Matheus Dorigatti Soldatelli, Khashayar Namdar, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins, Kristen W. Yeom, Farzad Khalvati, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, Matthias Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationVector InstituteHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineReceiver operating characteristicBiopsyRandom forestMagnetic resonance imagingOncologyPathologyArtificial intelligenceInternal medicineRadiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> Molecular biomarker identification increasingly influences the treatment planning of pediatric low-grade neuroepithelial tumors (PLGNTs). We aimed to develop and validate a radiomics-based ADC signature predictive of the molecular status of PLGNTs. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> In this retrospective bi-institutional study, we searched the PACS for baseline brain MRIs from children with PLGNTs. Semiautomated tumor segmentation on ADC maps was performed using the semiautomated level tracing effect tool with 3D Slicer. Clinical variables, including age, sex, and tumor location, were collected from chart review. The molecular status of tumors was derived from biopsy. Multiclass random forests were used to predict the molecular status and fine-tuned using a grid search on the validation sets. Models were evaluated using independent and unseen test sets based on the combined data, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for the prediction of 3 classes: <i>KIAA1549-BRAF</i> fusion, <i>BRAF</i> V600E mutation, and non-<i>BRAF</i> cohorts. Experiments were repeated 100 times using different random data splits and model initializations to ensure reproducible results. <h3>RESULTS:</h3> Two hundred ninety-nine children from the first institution and 23 children from the second institution were included (53.6% male; mean, age 8.01 years; 51.8% supratentorial; 52.2% with <i>KIAA1549-BRAF</i> fusion). For the 3-class prediction using radiomics features only, the average test AUC was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.73–0.75), and using clinical features only, the average test AUC was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.66–0.68). The combination of both radiomics and clinical features improved the AUC to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75–0.77). The diagnostic performance of the per-class test AUC was higher in identifying <i>KIAA1549-BRAF</i> fusion tumors among the other subgroups (AUC = 0.81 for the combined radiomics and clinical features versus 0.75 and 0.74 for <i>BRAF</i> V600E mutation and non-<i>BRAF</i>, respectively). <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> ADC values of tumor segmentations have differentiative signals that can be used for training machine learning classifiers for molecular biomarker identification of PLGNTs. ADC-based pretherapeutic differentiation of the <i>BRAF</i> status of PLGNTs has the potential to avoid invasive tumor biopsy and enable earlier initiation of targeted therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207