Standards of care and educational gaps in adult cystic fibrosis units: a European Respiratory Society survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Significant progress in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) has substantially extended the life expectancy of patients with CF (pwCF). Consequently, the population of adult pwCF has outnumbered paediatric patients in most developed countries. Ageing is a new factor that can contribute to disease complexity and can require adaptation of CF units. Therefore, the necessity for standardised, specialised and multidisciplinary care is imperative. Concerns arise regarding the adequacy of current healthcare, therapeutic and educational offerings. Methods: To address these concerns, a multinational survey was conducted to assess the current state of care in specialised multidisciplinary adult and paediatric CF units and identify areas for improvement. Responses were collected from 44 centres providing regular care to CF patients. Results: The survey unveiled considerable disparities in the availability of critical resources, including diagnostic access, supplementary testing, treatment modalities, transplant and transition programmes, and healthcare professionals' training. Conclusion: This study underscores the urgent need to standardise care across these centres in order to minimise disparities in terms of available resources and training with a particular emphasis on adult pwCF who are becoming more numerous and showing different needs with ageing. The changing landscape of CF in adulthood will require constant monitoring to ensure proper adaptation of the current model of care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".