Centrifuge model tests of h-type anti-slide pile reinforced slope under different rainfall duration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The h-type anti-slide pile (h-pile) plays a crucial role in mitigating soil-rock mixture slope (SRMS) instability. Despite its significance, the limited availability of research outcomes has constrained the practical application of h-piles for SRMS reinforcement. This study employs three centrifuge model tests to investigate the behavior and performance of h-pile-reinforced SRMS under rainfall conditions. We systematically describe the response of earth pressure on the pile side and behind the pile, bending moment along the pile, and pore water pressure at the slope toe and pile side. This elucidates the evolution of soil arching for h-piles under rainfall conditions. The results reveal that rainfall duration influences the distribution pattern of earth pressure on the pile side, while the distribution pattern of bending moment for the h-pile remains unaffected. Additionally, the soil arching pattern between piles demonstrates joint arching, involving the combined action of frictional arching and end-bearing arching. The evolution process of soil arching between piles under rainfall conditions gradually dissipates from bottom to top and from far to near.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".