Exploration of thermal radiation and stagnation point in MHD micropolar nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet with Navier slip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quest to strengthen heat conduction of thermal science base fluid for effective industrial outputs and engineering derives has recently increased. Thus, this study aims to determine how thermal radiation and slip effects affect the flow of a micropolar nanofluid near a stagnation point over an extending sheet. Using similarity transformations, the flow-controlling partial differential equations (PDEs) are turned into a set of non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The non-linear system of equations has been solved by the numerical technique Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg integration scheme implementing the shooting technique with suitable conditions to generate a numerical solution. The essential factors affecting the flow are depicted graphically and tabularly. Additionally, a comparison is conducted between the present result and previously published data on the Nusselt and Sherwood numbers; it claims that thermophoresis and Brownian motion vary under some restrictive conditions. An increase in the magnetic field parameter was found to boost the velocity of the micropolar nanofluid. In contrast, a rise in the micropolar parameter reduces the angular velocity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".