MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394727750 · doi:10.7759/cureus.58055

Effectiveness of Evening Primrose and Vitamin E for Cyclical Mastalgia: A Prospective Study

2024· article· en· W4394727750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaya Kumari, Amrita Amrita, Archana Sinha, Supriya Kumari, Pratibha Biswas, Poonam Poonam

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Lesions and Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvening primroseEvening Primrose OilMedicineEveningInternal medicineTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cyclical mastalgia, which is characterized by cyclic breast pain associated with the menstrual cycle, is a common condition among premenopausal women. Despite their prevalence, effective treatment options remain limited. Evening primrose oil (EPO) and vitamin E have been proposed as potential therapies for cyclical mastalgia; however, their efficacy remains uncertain, particularly when used in combination. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EPO, vitamin E, and their combination in alleviating breast pain associated with cyclical mastalgia through a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Premenopausal women (n=126) with cyclical mastalgia were recruited from gynecology clinics and randomized to receive EPO (1000 mg twice daily), vitamin E (400 mg once daily), their combination, or a placebo for six months. Randomization was performed using computer-generated random numbers. Participants were assessed at baseline and monthly intervals for six months. The primary outcome was the change in breast pain severity measured using a validated pain questionnaire such as the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included changes in breast pain characteristics, adverse effects, and treatment adherence. RESULTS: A total of 126 participants participated in this study. The combination of EPO and vitamin E demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing breast pain severity compared with individual treatments and placebo (p < 0.001). Participants in the combination group experienced a mean reduction in breast pain severity of 4.5 points on the pain scale, whereas those in the EPO and vitamin E groups experienced reductions of 2.5 and 3.0 points, respectively. Both EPO and vitamin E alone also showed significant improvements compared with placebo (p < 0.05), with mean reductions in breast pain severity of 2.0 and 2.5 points, respectively. Adverse effects were minimal and comparable across the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with EPO and vitamin E appears to be an effective treatment option for cyclical mastalgia, offering superior pain relief compared with individual treatments and placebo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicBreast Lesions and CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207