MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394766511 · doi:10.36076/ppj.2024.27.e109

Pain Characteristics of Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Comparison Between Gender and Different Emotional States

2024· article· en· W4394766511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Physician · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibromyalgiaMedicinePhysical therapyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Generalized pain is the core symptom of fibromyalgia (FM). Few studies have described FM's different pain characteristics under various conditions. OBJECTIVE: To explore the pain characteristics of patients with FM of different gender and emotional states. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A medical center in Beijing, People's Republic of China. METHODS: A total of 197 patients with FM were recruited from an outpatient clinic. Three distinct instruments were used to assess their pain characteristics: the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) to assess pain severity, the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) to assess the number of pain regions, and the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) to assess pain qualities. The Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale were used to assess patients' emotional states. An independent 2-sample t test, chi-squared test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze gender pain characteristics differences and different emotional states (with/without anxiety, with/without depression). RESULTS: Pain severity on the NRS-11 was 7 (5-8), the number of pain regions determined by WPI was 13 (10-16), and the total score of different pain qualities from the SF-MPQ-2 was 2.36 (1.68-3.73) in all patients with FM. The most frequently reported regions of pain were the right shoulder girdle (89.34%), left shoulder girdle (88.32%), upper back (85.28%), and neck (81.73%). The most frequently reported pain qualities were tiredness/exhaustion (97.46%), aching pain (94.42%), numbness (78.68%), cold/freezing pain (75.63%), and tenderness (75.13%). Women patients reported more severe pain and numbness, less frequent chest pain, and shooting pain than men patients did. Patients with FM and anxiety experienced more frequent and more severe feelings of punishing/cruel thoughts, fearfulness, sickening, and tenderness; more frequent jaw pain and cold-freezing pain; more severe pain caused by light touch and tiredness/exhaustion; less frequent lower leg pain than those without anxiety did. Patients with FM and depression reported more frequent and more severe pain caused by light touch; more frequent tenderness; more severe feelings of tiredness/exhaustion, sickening,fearfulness, and punishing/cruel thoughts; and less frequent and less severe piercing pain than those without depression did. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study are its single-center design and lack of objective pain indicators. CONCLUSION: Gender significantly affected pain severity, chest pain, numbness, and shooting pain. Jaw pain, lower leg pain, cold/freezing pain, tenderness, pain caused by light touch, piercing pain, and pain-affective descriptors are closely related to emotional states in FM. A comprehensive understanding of pain characteristics in patients with FM would be helpful for disease education, diagnosis, and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePain PhysicianSame topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207