Effects of Continuous Nursing Intervention Combined with Breathing Training Guidance on Improving the Rehabilitation Effect and Self-care Ability of Elderly Patients with COPD.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of continuous nursing intervention and breathing training guidance on improving the rehabilitation effect and self-care ability of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: A total of 88 first-episode subjects were recruited in this study, all of whom were elderly Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients diagnosed and treated in our hospital between August 2019 and December 2021. All of them met the complete inclusion criteria. After registration, the patients were randomly divided into the combination and conventional groups, and 44 patients were included in each group. Patients in the conventional group were provided with conventional nursing care, and patients in the combination group were provided with continuous nursing intervention combined with breathing training guidance. The clinical data of all patients were collected, and the indicators, including lung function, quality of life, self-care ability, subjective well-being index, and self-care ability of patients, were compared. Results: The levels of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the routine group after the intervention. The quality of life scores in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the routine group after intervention. The MBI index in the combination group was significantly higher than in the routine group. The Memorial University of Newfoundland happiness scale (MUNSH) score of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the routine group. The combination group's self-care ability assessment scale (ESCA) score was significantly higher than that of the routine group. Conclusion: The intervention method of continuous nursing intervention combined with breathing training guidance for elderly patients with COPD has a significant effect on improving the rehabilitation effect of patients; that is, after the intervention, it can effectively improve the pulmonary function indicators of patients, improve the quality of life and self-care ability of patients, reducing the lack of subjective well-being of patients caused by negative emotions, while effectively improving the self-care ability of patients, has positive clinical significance for the prognosis of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".