MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394767217 · doi:10.36076/ppj.2024.27.121

Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Osteoarthritis Knee Pain in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2024· article· en· W4394767217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Physician · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisRadiofrequency ablationRandomized controlled trialPulsed radiofrequencyUltrasoundChronic painPhysical therapyAblationSurgeryRadiologyPain reliefInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA) is the main cause of disability in elderly people. Patients with KOA may often not achieve adequate pain control even after receiving all treatment modalities. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a treatment for moderate and severe KOA. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study. SETTING: The study was performed in the National Pain Management and Research Center of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. METHODS: Eligible participants were over 50 years old and had suffered from chronic knee joint pain for more than 6 months, scoring at least 4 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and grade III-IV according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification system. The target nerve selection principle was as follows: the superomedial genicular nerve (SMGN) branch and inferior medial genicular nerve (IMGN) branch of the saphenous nerve for medial knee pain, the superolateral genicular nerve (SLGN) branch of the femoral nerve for lateral pain, and the SMGN, IMGN, and SLGN branches for total knee pain. The main outcomes were the NRS pain score (including the most severe pain), the average pain, and the proportion of patients who had reached pain reduction of more than 2 points. The secondary outcome was the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. RFA at 70ºC was performed for 120 seconds per patient in the RFA group, and knee nerve blocks were performed in the control group. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected in this study. The treatment groups showed significant differences in their mean NRS scores and worst pain during the first, third, and sixth months after treatment. There were significant differences in the mean WOMAC pain, physical function, and total scores between the treatment groups and over time. Between the treatment groups and over time, the mean WOMAC stiffness scores were not different. At each time point after treatment, the proportion of patients who needed analgesic drugs was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the control group. Univariate analysis showed that gender, age, pain course, and body mass index were not significantly correlated with the positive rate (NRS >= 2 score reduction). After we adjusted for multiple factors, the perceived beneficial effect of therapy was less when gonarthritis was more severe (P < 0.01). LIMITATION: This study's limitation is that it was performed in only one unit of the National Pain Management and Research Center. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided RFA applied to knee nerves can significantly reduce KOA pain, improve knee joint function, improve patient satisfaction, and provide a feasible, safe, and effective minimally invasive procedure for moderate to severe KOA in elderly patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it