MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394772277 · doi:10.5376/jmr.2024.14.0003

Comparative Analysis of Dengue and Zika Virus Transmissibility in Primates

2024· article· en· W4394772277 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuan Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mosquito Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZika virusDengue feverVirologyTransmission (telecommunications)BiologyDengue virusViral replicationTransmissibility (structural dynamics)Virus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper "Trade-offs shaping transmission of sylvatic dengue and Zika viruses in monkey hosts" authored by Kathryn A. Hanley, Hélène Cecilia, Sasha R. Azar, et al., was published in Nature Communications on March 27, 2024. The authors are affiliated with Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical School, among other institutions. This study explores the factors affecting the transmission of Dengue (DENV) and Zika (ZIKV) viruses in monkey hosts. By experimentally infecting Asian ancestral host species (rhesus monkeys) and a New World host species (squirrel monkeys), the study investigated viral replication, innate and adaptive immune responses (natural killer cells and neutralizing antibodies), and transmission to mosquitoes. Results show that ZIKV reached high titers in both hosts and translated to high mosquito transmission rates; in contrast, DENV-2 had lower replication levels, with transmission occurring only when serum viral titers were below or near the detection limit. The study reveals the immune-mediated trade-offs between the duration and intensity of viral replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mosquito ResearchSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207