MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394773094 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56107-8

Process Mining Workshops

2024· book· en· W4394773094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Johannes De Smedt, Pnina Soffer

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in business information processing · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLibera Università di BolzanoRWTH Aachen UniversityUniversität MannheimUniversità della CalabriaTechnische Universität BerlinUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroUniversità degli Studi di TorinoHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenTechnische Universität MünchenTartu ÜlikoolUniversidade de São PauloMemorial University of NewfoundlandInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of LeedsUniversität PotsdamKarolinska InstitutetUniversità degli Studi di CamerinoUniversiteit UtrechtKU LeuvenUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaUniversiteit HasseltTechnische Universiteit EindhovenMonash UniversityPohang University of Science and TechnologyIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchUniversità degli Studi di MilanoOrganisation Canadienne des Physiciens MédicauxPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileUniversität St. GallenUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaUniversity of HaifaDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetQueensland University of TechnologyUniversidad de SevillaUniversità di PisaSan Diego State UniversityUniversität TrierUniversity of OttawaYork UniversityMinistry of Education, IndiaNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsSapienza Università di RomaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsProcess (computing)Computer scienceProcess managementEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1970.136

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in business information processingSame topicBusiness Process Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207