Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueLecture notes in business information processing · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLibera Università di BolzanoRWTH Aachen UniversityUniversität MannheimUniversità della CalabriaTechnische Universität BerlinUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroUniversità degli Studi di TorinoHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenTechnische Universität MünchenTartu ÜlikoolUniversidade de São PauloMemorial University of NewfoundlandInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of LeedsUniversität PotsdamKarolinska InstitutetUniversità degli Studi di CamerinoUniversiteit UtrechtKU LeuvenUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaUniversiteit HasseltTechnische Universiteit EindhovenMonash UniversityPohang University of Science and TechnologyIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchUniversità degli Studi di MilanoOrganisation Canadienne des Physiciens MédicauxPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileUniversität St. GallenUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaUniversity of HaifaDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetQueensland University of TechnologyUniversidad de SevillaUniversità di PisaSan Diego State UniversityUniversität TrierUniversity of OttawaYork UniversityMinistry of Education, IndiaNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsSapienza Università di RomaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsProcess (computing)Computer scienceProcess managementEngineeringProgramming language
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
