A Deep-Learning-Based Data-Management Scheme for Intelligent Control of Wastewater Treatment Processes Under Resource-Constrained IoT Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effective data management schemes have always been the major demand in universal industrial Internet of Things (IoT) systems, especially in resource-constrained scenarios. In realistic wastewater treatment process (WTP), only limited monitoring data resource can be available due to some digital constraint. Aiming at this practical issue, this work explores utilization of deep neural network to deal with such practical issue in the objective situation. Therefore, a deep learning-based data management scheme for intelligent control of WTP under resource-constrained IoT systems, is proposed in this paper. Firstly, a specific data encoding and preprocessing approach is developed for the objective business scenario. Then, the detailed workflow of a deep neural network structure is applied to predict key intermediate parameters which can further guide control decision. Finally, a comprehensive series of experiments are conducted on a real-world dataset which covers a range of one year. Both efficiency and robustness of the proposal are tested by introducing several performance metrics. The results show that it can have proper prediction effect in such resource-constrained environment, which can facilitate following intelligent control operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".