Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) standard, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, is the reference document for seismic design of steel structures throughout the United States. The 2003 International Building Code (IBC) incorporated these provisions by reference, and the 2002 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 5000 Building Code also followed this approach. Since their 1997 publication, the AISC Seismic Provisions have been updated on a regular basis in order to incorporate new developments from post-Northridge earthquake research on moment frames and other work in this area. The latest revision culminated with the publication of a completely new set of provisions in 2005 that is in the same unified format as the main AISC design specification. In addition, this edition makes reference to a new AISC standard for the pre-qualification of seismic moment connections that was also completed in 2005. Coordinated efforts between AISC and the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) are intended to continue the process of keeping the seismic design provisions for structural steel buildings as current as possible. Efforts to coordinate with Canadian standards are also underway. This presentation will summarize the changes incorporated into the 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions and the use of the new moment connection pre-qualification standard. It will also speculate on future modifications and additions to the U.S. seismic design provisions for structural steel buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".