On Domination and 2-packing Numbers in Intersecting Linear Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A linear system is a pair \((P,\mathcal{L})\) where \(\mathcal{L}\) is a finite family of subsets on a finite ground set \(P\) such that any two subsets of \(\mathcal{L}\) share at most one element. Furthermore, if for every two subsets of \(\mathcal{L}\) share exactly one element, the linear system is called intersecting. A linear system \((P,\mathcal{L})\) has rank \(r\) if the maximum size of any element of \(\mathcal{L}\) is \(r\). By \(\gamma(P,\mathcal{L})\) and \(\nu_2(P,\mathcal{L})\) we denote the size of the minimum dominating set and the maximum 2-packing of a linear system \((P,\mathcal{L})\), respectively. It is known that any intersecting linear system \((P,\mathcal{L})\) of rank \(r\) is such that \(\gamma(P,\mathcal{L})\leq r-1\). Li et al. in [S. Li, L. Kang, E. Shan and Y. Dong, The finite projective plane and the 5-Uniform linear intersecting hypergraphs with domination number four, Graphs and 34 Combinatorics (2018) , no.~5, 931–945.] proved that every intersecting linear system of rank 5 satisfying \(\gamma(P,\mathcal{L})=4\) can be constructed from a 4-uniform intersecting linear subsystem \((P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)\) of the projective plane of order 3 satisfying \(\tau(P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)=\nu_2(P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)=4\), where \(\tau(P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)\) is the transversal number of \((P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)\). In this paper, we give an alternative proof of this result given by Li et al., giving a complete characterization of these 4-uniform intersecting linear subsystems. Moreover, we prove a general case, that is, we prove if $q$ is an odd prime power and \((P,\mathcal{L})\) is an intersecting linear system of rank \((q+2)\) satisfying \(\gamma(P,\mathcal{L})=q+1\), then this linear system can be constructed from a spanning \((q+1)\)-uniform intersecting linear subsystem \((P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)\) of the projective plane of order \(q\) satisfying \(\tau(P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)=\nu_2(P^\prime,\mathcal{L}^\prime)=q+1\).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".