MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394797607 · doi:10.1002/mds.29809

Stability of Mosaic Divergent Repeat Interruptions in X‐Linked Dystonia‐Parkinsonism

2024· article· en· W4394797607 on OpenAlexafffund
Joshua Laß, Theresa Lüth, Kathleen Schlüter, Susen Schaake, Björn‐Hergen Laabs, Christoph Much, Roland Dominic G. Jamora, Raymond L. Rosales, Gerard Saranza, Cid Czarina E. Diesta, Christopher E. Pearson, Inke R. König, Norbert Brüggemann, Christine Klein, Ana Westenberger, Joanne Trinh

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPeter und Traudl Engelhorn StiftungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMassachusetts General Hospital
KeywordsParkinsonismDystoniaTrinucleotide repeat expansionLogistic regressionBiologyInternal medicineMedicineGeneticsDiseaseNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background X‐Linked dystonia‐parkinsonism (XDP) is an adult‐onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by rapidly progressive dystonia and parkinsonism. Mosaic Divergent Repeat Interruptions affecting motif Length and Sequence (mDRILS) were recently found within the TAF1 SVA repeat tract and were shown to associate with repeat stability and age at onset in XDP, specifically the AGGG [5′‐SINE‐VNTR‐Alu( AGAGGG ) 2 AGGG ( AGAGGG ) n ] mDRILS. Objective This study aimed to investigate the stability of mDRILS frequencies and stability of ( AGAGGG ) n repeat length during transmission in parent–offspring pairs. Methods Fifty‐six families (n = 130) were investigated for generational transmission of repeat length and mDRILS. The mDRILS stability of 16 individuals was assessed at two sampling points 1 year apart. DNA was sequenced with long‐read technologies after long‐range polymerase chain reaction amplification of the TAF1 SVA. Repeat number and mDRILS were detected with Noise‐Cancelling Repeat Finder (NCRF). Results When comparing the repeat domain, 51 of 65 children had either contractions or expansions of the repeat length. The AGGG frequency remained stable across generations at 0.074 (IQR: 0.069–0.078) ( z = −0.526; P = 0.599). However, the median AGGG frequency in children with an expansion (0.072 [IQR: 0.066–0.076]) was lower compared with children with retention or contraction (0.080 [IQR: 0.073–0.083]) ( z = −0.007; P = 0.003). In a logistic regression model, the AGGG frequency predicted the outcome of either expansion or retention/contraction when including repeat number and sex as covariates (β = 80.7; z ‐score = 2.63; P = 0.0085). The AGGG frequency varied slightly over 1 year (0.070 [IQR: 0.063–0.080] to 0.073 [IQR: 0.069–0.078]). Conclusions Our results show that a higher AGGG frequency may stabilize repeats across generations. This highlights the importance of further investigating mDRILS as a disease‐modifying factor with generational differences. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207