MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394821861 · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042414

Phase transitions in sampling and error correction in local Brownian circuits

2024· article· en· W4394821861 on OpenAlexafffund
Subhayan Sahu, Shao-Kai Jian

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersMinistry of Colleges and Universities
KeywordsStatistical physicsBrownian motionHamiltonian (control theory)Electronic circuitScalingMathematicsPhase transitionReplicaPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the emergence of anticoncentration and approximate unitary design behavior in local Brownian circuits. The dynamics of circuit-averaged moments of the probability distribution and entropies of the output state can be represented as imaginary-time evolution with an effective local Hamiltonian in the replica space. This facilitates large-scale numerical simulation of the dynamics in $1+1$ dimensions of such circuit-averaged quantities using tensor network tools as well as identifying the various regimes of the Brownian circuit as distinct thermodynamic phases. In particular, we identify the emergence of anticoncentration as a sharp transition in the collision probability at $lnN$ timescale, where $N$ is the number of qubits. We also show evidence for a specific classical approximation algorithm undergoing a computational hardness transition at the same timescale. In the presence of noise, we show there is a noise-induced first-order phase transition in the linear cross entropy benchmark when the noise rate is scaled down as $1/N$. At longer times, the Brownian circuits approximate a unitary 2-design in $O(N)$ time. We directly probe the feasibility of quantum error correction by such circuits and identify a first-order transition at $O(N)$ timescales. The scaling behaviors for all these phase transitions are obtained from the large-scale numerics and corroborated by analyzing the spectrum of the effective replica Hamiltonian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207