MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394824770 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00069-x

Fostering planetary health in polluted environments: lessons from the Xonacatlán Indigenous Council in Mexico

2024· article· en· W4394824770 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos E. Sánchez-Pimienta

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousParticipatory action researchHealth equityStorytellingPolitical sciencePublic healthNarrativePublic relationsSociologyEnvironmental planningGeographyEcologyMedicineBiologyAnthropologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The communities of El Salto and Juanacatlán face negative impacts on human and ecosystem health due to their proximity to the second-largest industrial area in Mexico. Despite living in a region negatively impacted by high levels of pollution, these communities have organised to foster planetary health by reforesting with native plants, campaigning to stop further industrial development, and founding the Xonacatlán Indigenous Council (XIC) to reclaim traditional ways of living. This research project seeks to advance insights on the implications of fostering planetary health from the perspective of communities facing adverse socioeconomic and environmental conditions. METHODS: This qualitative study draws from participatory action research, Indigenous storywork, and ethnography. The XIC acted as the community advisory board of this research project and two XIC members are part of the research team. We investigate whether the stories and practices of community members associated with XIC contribute to fostering planetary health. Research activities will include 40-60 participants in storytelling interviews, story-making workshops, and participant observation in XIC activities. Data collection started on Nov 20, 2023, and will be finalised in August, 2024. FINDINGS: Our ethnographic analysis investigates local understandings of the relationships between human and ecosystem health. Anticipated findings include stories about the rejection of narratives of industrial progress due to environmental damage, the reconnection with Coca identities and traditional ways of relating to the land, and the use of direct action to counteract the negligence of the state-sponsored public health system and assert local planetary health needs. INTERPRETATION: By assessing grassroots Coca Indigenous action as a site of collective expertise on planetary health, we expect that this research project will bring attention to how people living in polluted environments can inform the conceptual development of planetary health and expand the range of practical initiatives that are considered fundamental to sustaining human and ecosystem life. FUNDING: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207