← Back to cohort
IEEE VR 2024 Paper Reviewers
Ashu Adhikari, Ana Paula Afonso, Roland Aigner, Aditya Satya, Geórgia Albuquerque, Rawan Alghofaili, Toshiyuki Amano, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Daniel Andersen, Samuel Ang, Christoph Anthes, Tenglong Ao, Imtiaz Arafat, Mohammed Arefin, Arevalo Safayet, Stephanie Arévalo Arboleda, Andreas Aristidou, Clemens Arth, Sahar Aseeri, M Omar Faruque Sarker, Mushfiqur Azam, Miroslav Bachinski, Junxuan Bai, Gilles Bailly, Kristin A. Bartlett, Scott Bateman, Brett Benda, Edurne Bernal-Berdun, Eliezer Emanuel Bernart, Florent Berthaut, Wes Bethel, Briana Bettin, Michael Beyeler, Katherine Bezanson, Ayush Bhargava, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Verena Biener, Mark Billinghurst, Pauline Bimberg, Arnab Biswas, João Marcos Bittencourt, Loën Boban, Antonio Boccaccio, Alberto Boem, Dan Bohus, Elise Bonnail, Saeed Boorboor, Zahra Borhani, Pierre Bourdin, Sam Bourgault, Guillaume Bouyer, Riccardo Bovo, Judy Bowen, Doug A. Bowman, Efe Bozkir, Klara Brandstätter, Hugo Brument, Lauren Buck, Andreas Bulling, François Cabestaing, Araya Cabrera, Raquel Cai, Shaoyu Cai, Zhuojiang Caluya, Nicko Fidalgo, Graciela Cantory, Ville Cao, Ruochen Cardenas Hernandez, Fer- Nando Casas, Dan Cellary, Wojciech Center, Evan Caillet, Adrien Chalmers, Andrew T. Chan, Liwei Chang, Ruei-Che Chang, Zhuang Chardonnet, J.K. Chen, Changan Chen, Kan Chen, Karen Chen, Yuedong Chen, Cheng Zhang, Haojie Cheng, Haonan Cheng, Shiwei Cheng, Yi Chiossi, Nusrat Choudhury, Iain Chuang, Jung-Hong Chung, Ji Clark, Jack Clarke, T. Colley, Mark Çöltekin, Arzu Conversy, Stéphane Cordeil, Maxime Correa De Almeida, Gustavo Corrêa, Rosa Cleber Costa, Samuel E. Cox, Chris Creed, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Charlotte Croucher, Tor-Salve Dalsgaard, Kurtis Danyluk, Grigoris Daskalogrigorakis, Brendan David-John, Jesus De, Victor Adriel de Jesus Oliveira, Francesco De Pace, Donald Degraen, Doga Demirel, Xiaoming Deng, Zhigang Deng, Nikhil Deshpande, Bastian Dewitz, Deyrel Diaz, Aolin Ding, Fan Ding, Tilman Dingler, Yuta Kageyama, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Snehanjali Kalamkar, Yoshinari Kameda, Seitaro Kaneko, HyeongYeop Kang, Christina Karpodini, Sue E. Kase, Nathan Kassai, Akrivi Katifori, Minas Katsiokalis, Jonathan W. Kelly, Tat Eng, Joseph T. Kider, Hansung Kim, Hyung-il Kim, Jeeeun Kim, Jin Kim, Jin‐Wook Kim, Sunjun Kim, Alexandra Kitson, Vanessa Klein, Constantin Kleinbeck, Kathrin Knutzen, Sungahn Ko, Andrew J. Kolarik, Ryota Kondo, Panagiotis Kourtesis, Julian Kreimeier, Nikhil Krishnaswamy, Ola Kristensson, Claudia Krogmeier, Assem Kroma, Ernst Kruijff, Rafael Kuffner dos Anjos
Bibliographic record
Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Virtual realityMultimediaHuman–computer interaction
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.998
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno