MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394833081 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.4c00279

Selective Photocatalytic Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid on Graphite Carbon Nitride with Dual-Sited Cobalt and Platinum Cocatalysts

2024· article· en· W4394833081 on OpenAlexafffund
Hang Xu, Heng Zhao, Jian Xu, Mehdi Eisapour, Zechuan Yu, Hang Su, Yuan Li, Fujian Zhou, Jinguang Hu, Zhangxin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada First Research Excellence FundUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsDehydrogenationHydrogen productionPhotocatalysisCobaltFormic acidHydrogenDeprotonationGraphitic carbon nitridePlatinumInorganic chemistryChemistryGraphite oxideCatalysisPhotochemistryMaterials scienceOxideOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photocatalytic hydrogen production from the selective dehydrogenation of liquid organic hydrogen carriers is emerging as a promising alternative for green hydrogen generation. In this work, graphite carbon nitride (CN)-based photocatalyst is rationally designed by photodeposition of cobalt oxide nanoparticles as the hole trapper for the deprotonation of formic acid (FA), while the photogenerated electrons collected by in situ photodeposited platinum (Pt) nanoparticles reduce these protons to produce sustainable hydrogen. As a result, the well-designed photocatalyst (Co-CN) exhibits excellent hydrogen evolution activity (9039 μmol/h/g) and >99.98% dehydrogenation selectivity. Besides, Co-CN shows great durability in the long-time cycling test. Density functional theory reveals the contribution of Pt and cobalt oxide on the deprotonation from O–H and C–H breakage, respectively. Technoeconomic analysis demonstrates the potential of this reaction system for scale-up application. This present work demonstrates a great example for green hydrogen production from dehydrogenation of liquid organic hydrogen carriers under a mild condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207