MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394844371 · doi:10.1101/2024.04.13.589367

A multistate capture-recapture model to estimate reproduction of North Atlantic right whales

2024· preprint· en· W4394844371 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel W. Linden, Richard M. Pace, Lance Garrison, Jeffrey A. Hostetler, Amy R. Knowlton, Véronique Lesage, Rob Williams, Michael C. Runge

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsIce calvingRight whaleReproductionPredationMark and recaptureEndangered speciesPopulationFisheryBiologyVital ratesClimate changeEcologyGeographyHabitatDemographyPopulation growthLactationPregnancyWhale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The recent steep decline of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales ( Eubalaena glacialis ) can be attributed to high mortality combined with low reproduction. While the former is a clear result of anthro-pogenic activity, the latter involves more complexity. Evidence suggests that both short-term fluctuations in prey availability and long-term decline in health are responsible for depressed right whale calving rates. To facilitate an assessment of extinction risk, we developed a multistate capture-recapture model that estimated the probability of calving using extensive sightings data from 1990-2019. The model estimated sub-lethal effects of severe injury on calving probability, and modeled temporal variability in calving as related to indices of prey availability ( Calanus spp. biomass) and an apparent regime shift. The average annual probability of calving for known-breeding females, given average prey conditions, decreased from 0.217 [0.162, 0.281] to 0.142 [0.067, 0.252] after the 2010 regime shift. The model indicated strong evidence of a relationship between calving probability and the prey index from the eastern Gulf of Maine, though this relationship effectively disappeared after 2010; moderate evidence for a relationship with prey from the southwest Gulf of St. Lawrence remained. Weak evidence of reduced calving probability due to severe injury resulted from low sample sizes, given increased mortality for individuals observed with severe injuries. The regime effect is hypothesized to be capturing a long-term decline in health due to a combination of decreasing habitat quality resulting from climate change and potentially chronic sublethal injuries (e.g., entanglements). Our reproduction model provides demographic parameter estimates that can be used in population projections for North Atlantic right whales, though uncertainty remains in the mechanisms responsible for recent declines in calving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→