Dual-frequency sheath oscillations and consequences on the ion and electron transport in dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current–voltage characteristics, space- and time-resolved optical emission spectroscopy, and 1D fluid modeling are used to examine the effect of dual-frequency sheath oscillations on the ion and electron transport in dielectric barrier discharges sustained by a combination of low frequency (LF, 50 kHz, 650 V) and radiofrequency (RF, 5.3 MHz, 195 V) voltages, exhibiting the α-to-γ mode transition. On one hand, when polarities of the LF and RF voltages are opposite, an electric field near the LF cathode (due to LF cathode sheath) drives the secondary electrons to the plasma bulk and an opposite electric field between the sheath edge and the LF anode attracts the electrons toward the LF cathode (to maintain quasi-neutrality in the plasma bulk). At the sheath edge, electrons become trapped and ions drift toward the cathode and the anode simultaneously according to their position in the gap. On the other hand, when the RF voltage has the same polarity as the LF voltage, the total applied voltage increases and this yields to enhanced production of electrons and ions in the sheath. To maintain quasi-neutrality in the bulk, the electric field along the gap exhibits the same polarity as the one in the sheath, allowing electrons created in the sheath to be evacuated toward the LF anode. The behavior of the LF cathode is, therefore, controlled by the LF sheath, and, thus, by the LF voltage amplitude, while the behavior in the bulk and at the anode alternates on the time scale of the RF voltage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".