Automated evaluation of hip abductor muscle quality and size in hip osteoarthritis: Localized muscle regions are strongly associated with overall muscle quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited information exists regarding abductor muscle quality variation across its length and which locations are most representative of overall muscle quality. This is exacerbated by time-intensive processes for manual muscle segmentation, which limits feasibility of large cohort analyses. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated and localized analysis pipeline that accurately estimates hip abductor muscle quality and size in individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis (OA) and identifies regions of each muscle which provide best estimates of overall muscle quality. Forty-four participants (age 52.7 ± 16.1 years, BMI 23.7 ± 3.4 kg/m2, 14 males) with and without mild-to-moderate radiographic hip OA were recruited for this study. Unilateral hip magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired on a 3.0 T MR scanner and included axial T1-weighted fast spin echo and 3D axial Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares estimation (IDEAL-IQ) spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) with multi-peak fat spectrum modeling and single T2* correction. A three dimensional (3D) V-Net convolutional neural network was trained to automatically segment the gluteus medius (GMED), gluteus minimus (GMIN), and tensor fascia lata (TFL) on axial IDEAL-IQ. Agreement between manual and automatic segmentation and associations between axial fat fraction (FF) estimated from IDEAL-IQ and overall muscle FF were evaluated. Dice scores for automatic segmentation were 0.94, 0.87, and 0.91 for GMED, GMIN, and TFL, respectively. GMED, GMIN, and TFL volumetric and FF measures were strongly correlated (r: 0.92–0.99) between automatic and manual segmentations, with 95% limits of agreement of [−1.99%, 2.89%] and [−9.79 cm3, 17.43 cm3], respectively. Axial FF was significantly associated with overall FF with the strongest correlations at 50%, 50%, and 65% the length of the GMED, GMIN, and TFL muscles, respectively (r: 0.93–0.97). An automated and localized analysis can provide efficient and accurate estimates of hip abductor muscle quality and size across muscle length. Specific regions of the muscle may be used to estimate overall muscle quality in an abbreviated evaluation of muscle quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".